Pocochina is writing some brilliant stuff post the Democratic primary:
I’m pissed at feminists who decided their feminism didn’t extend to That Bitch. I want to be clear, I’m not talking about feminists who, in good faith, decided that they wanted to support Obama, Edwards, Dodd, or whoever else. I am the first to state openly that reasonable people could have come to different decisions on that. I’m talking about feminists who, usually incisive and merciless in their rejection of expected gender roles, uncritically accept the Nasty Harpy narrative about Senator Clinton. I expect feminists to be able to step back and say, “well, knowing what I know about how I, and everyone around me, and in particular the chattering heads paid to tell me what to think about this campaign, have been conditioned in my expectations of female behavior, I am going to be critical of how I process this election.” For a lot of feminists (Edwards and Obama supporters as much as Clinton supporters) that happened; for a lot of them, it didn’t. I saw one feminist blogger say of Clinton’s suspension speech only, “Best speech of her political career.” The best speech of a thirty five year career of one of the most brilliant women in modern public life just so happens to be her concession? We’d be unbelievably suspicious of such an assessment about any other woman’s career – but it was Hillary, so it’s okay. It’s nauseating from a babbling jowl show – it is heartbreaking from a feminist. And the wheel turns, and a woman’s career is at its apex when she submits to a man.
More:
I think that non-feminist Obama supporters, and particularly male non-feminist Obama supporters, have this idea that we are just irrationally angry, our feelings are hurt and we should get over it or we’re just silly, don’t we know how bad McCain is, maybe they’ll just tell us one more time. The choice not to support Obama is a long-run rational choice. Right now, there is a party that hates women all the time, and a party that used to humor us, but hates us when it is convenient. It is our job to never, ever let it be convenient again, or there will be no one in government advocating for our rights.
We are not your sweeties, who just need candy and flowers to come around.
We are not your bitches, that is not a leash in your hand. Our bodily integrity is not a choke chain you may use to threaten us. If you think it is, you are no better than the Republicans. And yes, the “But! But! But!” Roe stick is just that – a threat. Politically involved women know exactly where we stand on Roe, and we know the Democrats haven’t been all that bothered to even look like they’re trying to protect it, these last seven years. We know what an anti-choice Supreme Court looks like, because we read Gonzales v. Carhart and our hearts broke in fear for ourselves and our sisters and nieces and daughters.
When you tell us that we’d better get in line and vote for Obama, OR ELSE ROE, you are holding our own bodies hostage against us, as if they were yours to take. You are actively, proudly, literally threatening us with our lives. Is that the change we should believe in?
Read the whole thing: Post-Primary Thoughts. [h/t: Donna Darko]
Dr. Violet Socks also is strategizing, smartly as ever, about the women’s vote and Obama/Dems.
Filed under: Feminism, Islam/Religion








Trackback: The Barefoot Bum won’t vote for the Dems.
One small quibble, though I know it isn’t your post – I recall from the Bush/Gore campaign that the media savaged Gore for the entire campaign, just like Clinton was savaged (only with different sorts of words) and just like with Clinton, it was Gore’s concession speech that the media hailed as his best.
[...] Pocochina Shines « The Apostate Need to come back and write about this later. to hillaryclinton election2008 sexism feminism sad [...]
Yay for Pocochina, and for the Bum.
How, precisely, are we holding your bodies hostage with the “Roe card”. Holding hostage would be if Democratic politicians threatened to retaliate against feminist women by undermining abortion rights. But Dems are saying “we can’t protect abortion rights if we’re not elected to office.” A hostage scenario is “do this or I will execute this person [right]“. It is not “if you fire me from the police, I can’t rescue the hostage”.
If you think Dems and Obama are lying when they say they’re pro-choice, fine, (although I think you’re really, really, really foolish if you do) but that’s a different claim. Noting that Republicans will, if they gain power, attempt to (and if they win this election, likely succeed at) outlaw abortion, and the only way to allay that scenario is to not elect anti-choice Republicans, is not hostage politics, its political analysis.